Just back from a week in Canada, attending a workshop at the University of Calgary on the Popularisation of War Memory, and then hiding in the mountains trying to write and enjoying the snow.

A varied collection of points that interested me:

1) Remembrance Day in Canada was a different experience. As an outsider, I was struck both by the depth of Canadian concern about their recent losses in Afghanistan and the communal expectation of poppy wearing and remembrance. Different poppies as well – cloth ones which disintegrate more easily, and which have never had ‘Haig Fund’ on their central circle. I think I should spend 11 November in other countries more often.

2) Except that, of course, I missed the chance to comment on Jon Snow’s refusal to wear a poppy.

3) It was a cleverly set up workshop, with a range of disciplines including sociologists and media studies as well as historians. Fortunately, the representatives of those disciplines could get on with each other and benefit from other perspectives – although my suggestion that we should all be forced to send our papers for comment to someone from a different discipline before they were published was shot down pretty quick. I realised that I’ve fallen behind on my knowledge of ‘memory studies’ – a couple of important books have come out in the last couple of years that I’ve not kept up with: this is the impetus to try to keep my toe in that water. I’ve often been uncomfortable with the fact that so much of this subject area is based around studies of ‘memory’ in connection with the Holocaust – or rather, I’ve been uncomfortable about applying the lessons which are derived to other events.

4) Got to meet Bruce Scates, the author of the wonderful Return to Gallipoli, which you should all read now. Bruce made me feel a bit uncomfortable about my very sceptical stance towards many of those who participate in remembrance activities today. Specifically, I think that I might too easily have mocked those who invest emotionally in the horror and poets version of the war, or who create elaborate imagined emotional connections to long dead ancestors. I spend a lot of time trying to rescue people like Douglas Haig and Neville Chamberlain from the enormous condescension of history – so it’s rather ill becoming, perhaps, to be too condescending to others.

But this might also be a matter of technique – Bruce, for example, makes use of surveys and personal conversations with modern pilgrims to the battlefields, whereas I’ve always tried to keep my subjects at arm’s length – not least because of the bond of trust that you build up with an individual through personal contact, which almost enforces respect upon you. And being critical and being honest about one’s reactions are also part of being a historian. Not sure if I’m going to change how I view the legions of people crying over Birdsong as a result of our conversations, but I am at least going to think about it.

5) Returned to some really good and completely unexpected news.


5 Responses to

  1. Jon Snow’s decision not to wear a poppy is truly baffling. I understand that he feels that he was being browbeaten. However, by choosing not to wear a poppy he is opening saying he does not wish to pay his respects to fallen soldiers. Strange.

  2. I think Jon Snow has raised a really interesting question. As he points out, newsreaders generally don’t wear badges that say they support breast cancer charities, or Save the Whale, or Aids Awareness. Recently there was disquiet expressed about a female newsreader who wore a crucifix.
    Yet the poppy is apparently somehow different – wearing it seems obligatory at the BBC, and it has been presented as uncontroversial.
    This year there has been a minor kerfuffle about white poppies, and Snow’s hyperbolic phrase-making about “poppy fascism.”
    My suspicion is that this disruption of the customary acceptance of Poppy Day as a national ritual has to do with widespread disquiet about the current war, which is making people reassess long-held attitudes.
    The controversies and shifts in attitudes could make a chapter in a new edition of your book, Dan. Congratulations on the prize.

  3. Alan Allport says:

    Congratulations on the prize.

    Ditto, and kudos.

  4. I think the politicising of poppy wearing is a very interesting point. I may be wrong but as far as I am concerned the poppy is a symbol of respect for fallen soldiers. Snow may not agree with the war but surely he supports the soldier in their jobs. The correct anti-war protest would be to not vote for Labour in the next general election, not to appear disrespectful.

  5. Jack says:

    Snow has stressed that he wears a poppy in ‘his private life’. The point that he is making is about his public persona and the role of journalists and anchormen in contemporary society. His desire to avoid using that role to ‘signify’ in any way whatsoever is, surely, highly commendable. I fail to understand why the _absence_ of a signifying symbol should be the source of any controversy whatsoever. No signifying symbol is ever culturally neutral; and cultural neutrality from those in the media is, surely, what we all desire?

    Those who choose to project onto Snow’s stance and statement the – separate – issues of white poppies, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc, etc are guilty of, at best, fuzzy logic, or, at worst, deliberate misrepresentation of him to further some other agenda of thier own – which is, I would have thought, precisely why he wears no signifying symbols (and this happens to, indeed must, include the poppy).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: